Tag Archives: observer

“Sleeping is important!” says programme about the importance of sleep

Something of a rarity on Bad PR today, with an appearance from the Guardian’s sister paper, The Observer:

Sleepless nights with screaming babies can ruin your marriage and your health

A screaming baby or a TV in a child’s room can lead to the parents’ divorce, claims new series

As any parents of a young child who is a problem sleeper will confirm, permanent tiredness and constant irritability can put a huge strain on your relationship. In fact, according to a survey, lack of sleep is a big factor in divorce and separation for a third of couples.

Ahead of a new series on the subject, a poll carried out for Channel 4 suggests the average parent surveyed got fewer than six hours of sleep a night. It also found that three in 10 couples who had split up said sleep deprivation since having their child was a factor in the breakup. Nearly 45% said they had dozed off in a place they shouldn’t have or was unsafe, with one in 20 admitting to falling asleep at the wheel of their car.

Source: The Observer, 17 March 2013

The Observer wasn’t alone in running the story, of course – the Daily Mail couldn’t pass up such a gilt-edged opportunity to fill more space in their newspaper and on their website:

Sleepless nights caused by crying babies ends one in three marriages, research claims 

Sleepless nights caused by a crying baby are blamed by  parents for the breakdown of up to a third of relationships, research shows.

Parents with a young child get about six hours sleep a night, an hour less than is recommended.

Experts also say that adults need at least five hours’ uninterrupted sleep to be able to function and concentrate properly the next day.

A survey of 2,000 parents found that 30 per cent of those who had divorced or separated blamed sleepless or interrupted nights caused by their children.

Source: Daily Mail, 17 March 2013

This particular story is a little thorny and a little tricky to unpick. For one, the Observer article (if not the Mail) makes it clear up front that this research came from the TV show ‘Bedtime Live’ – in fact it was release specifically to promote the show.

Another complication is the involvement of respected researcher Dr Tanya Byron, who appears to do robust work. Perhaps, then, this isn’t simply a case of spurious researched being used to prop up the advertising for a TV show? Perhaps this is legit? 

You’d certainly be forgiven for thinking so, however I’m not sure things are so clear and above-board – for instance, note the quotes from Dr Byron supporting the findings:

‘I see people whose children have chronic sleep problems and they’ll say things like their children get really upset if they try to send them to bed.

‘Well, I promise you, they won’t hate you in the morning when they’ve had a proper rest.

‘Our generation struggles  with discipline much more than any other, but the lack of boundaries will only cause more and more difficulties.

‘From a clinical perspective, a lot of those I see in my own  clinics, predominantly children, have underlying issues with not getting enough sleep, even if that isn’t the problem they are presenting with.

As you’ll see, this says nothing at all about the headlien claim that researchers discovered how sleepless nights lead to divorce – this, clearly, is a quote from Dr Byron on her participation in the show. 

Instead, the ‘research’ which uncovered this startling fact was an online poll conducted, I believe, via Bad PR regulars OnePoll – I certainly took part in a very similar survey on their site recently. If so, I’d consider the headline-grabbing statistic that marriages are ending over sleepless nights and crying babies to be highly suspicious.

What’s more, if I were Dr Byron, I might want to have a word with the show’s producers, to make sure future press releases made it very clear which claims came from the academic and which from the PR machine.

“Women lie about how much they eat!” says dodgy dieting firm

Few things feel as familiar to a seasoned PR watcher as a story built around a stereotype, especially a stereotype that’s damaging to women.

Whether we’re discovering women are addicted to shopping, obsessed with make-up or simply hating on their mother-in-law, a solidly anti-woman article is like a comfortable pair of slippers to those of us who look out for these things. Which is why it was impossible to turn down:

Women own up to guilt over eating habits

Boredom, stress and depression trigger secret snacking, poll finds

Millions of British women have eating binges, lie about how much they weigh and have a negative relationship with food, according to a survey. The study of 2,000 women also found that eating in secret is commonplace, with many refusing to tell family and friends the truth about how much they consume. Researchers said boredom, stress and feeling depressed were the biggest triggers causing women to eat more.

Three-quarters of UK women – 24 million – say they often feel guilty about how much they eat. Women typically think about food 12 times a day and those under 25 have it on their minds twice as much as those over 55, the poll found. Six out of 10 told researchers they had lied about how much food they ate, almost half (43.74%) said they snacked in secret and more than a quarter (27.68%) confessed to binge eating – this rises to more than a third (36.72%) of those under 25.

Still, this isn’t our usual fare: yes, the central point is that women are – in their millions – binging on junk food and eating in secret, causing an unhealthy relationship with food. That bit is no real surprise. But to appear in the Observer is a rarity – neither the Observer nor the Guardian are featured often in these pages, both holding themselves generally above this kind of damaging, flimsy commercial PR. 

Does the appearance of the research in the Observer mean this is more legitimate than what we usually see? Are there really millions of women around the country secretly fighting an unhealthy and damaging war with food and their own bodies? Is the research really more robust than the cynical PR we’re accustomed to? 


Linda O’Byrne, chief nutritionist for New Atkins Nutritional, which organised the survey, said: “These are very worrying figures that reveal many women are ill at ease with food. Whether it is bingeing, lying about how much you weigh or eating in secret, you must do your best to stamp it out. On a diet or not, food should never be the enemy. It should be a positive and not a negative influence in your life.”

So, that’s a no, then. In fact, the research which essentially tells us that women are not to be trusted around food comes from a company selling the Atkins Diet fad

We expect this kind of non-journalism from the Daily Mail, Daily Express and the Telegraph – you’re meant to be better than this, The Observer.