Do YOU know how much surgery on the NHS costs? You might be surprised…
DO you know how much procedures on the NHS really cost? New research suggests the British public is grossly ignorant about the real price of medical care.
The National Health Report 2015 was launched today and figure show we haven’t got a clue about how much procedures are really costing the NHS.
The report, compiled by mutual health and wellbeing provider Benenden, questioned 4,000 people across the UK asking them to put a cost to some common procedures and treatments.
Smokers and alcohol abusers should PAY for NHS treatment says new study
Most Britons believe treatment should not be free if damage has been self-inflicted
Almost nine in ten of us believe alcohol abusers should pay for their own treatment and not get it free on the NHS, a comprehensive new study reveals.
Last year more than 1.4 million people used NHS drug and alcohol services – including rehabilitation – at a total cost of £136 million.
Smokers and heavy drinkers should pay for treatment of ‘self-inflicted’ illnesses rather than expect NHS to foot the bill
The vast majority of people believe alcohol abusers should pay for their own treatment rather than get it free on the NHS, a survey has found.
More than half said the NHS should not fund treatment if the illness was a consequence of smoking and patients should be forced to pay for it themselves.
The report questioned 4,000 UK adults about the cost of common procedures in the UK and whether it should be publicly funded.
Not everyone in the country believes they should be responsible for jointly funding the healthcare of the nation – and at a time where the government increasingly looks to hand over parts of the NHS to private healthcare firms, articles like this can form a part of the justification for privatisation. Not only do stories like this serve as ‘proof’ of the current feeling of the public, but they also help to set the agenda and lead public opinion… which is why the source of this story is, as ever, absolutely key:
But the study, carried out by the Benenden National Health Report 2015, revealed how people were willing to con medical officials so they could have treatment paid for by the public purse.
Benenden are a private health firm, which makes their ‘discovery’ that people prefer to pay directly for health services they themselves need far from surprising. In that context, calling their PR survey the ‘National Health Report’ seems incredibly dicey – it’s not hard to see how some unsuspecting readers might assume this has something to do with the NHS, rather than with a private healthcare firm.
The obligatory spokesperson quote is just as interesting:
Medical Director of Benenden, Dr John Giles, said: ‘I suspect most people view diseases caused by excessive drinking and smoking as being self-inflicted and therefore potentially avoidable.
‘They probably feel that they should not have to pay the price for the consequences of the poor choices of others.
‘It comes as no surprise that the public has a staggering and destructive ignorance regarding the cost of treatments on the NHS.
‘As a nation we have lost touch with the role we should play in our own health and wellbeing, expecting the NHS to pick up the pieces.
‘If the public was more aware of the cost of appointments, treatments, operations and prescriptions, and really took responsibility for their own health, using the NHS only when absolutely necessary, the crisis the service finds itself in today would be significantly lessened.’
It’s uncontroversial to suggest that we ought to take care of ourselves and take responsibility for our own health. However, what Benenden are doing with this story and with this quote is to shift responsibility for the wellbeing of the NHS away from the politicians who continue to freeze funding, and onto the patients – and, specifically, onto certain groups of patients. This kind of thinking is the wedge that opens the door for separating oneself from these ‘problematic patient groups’, and into privatised medicine.
As far as this blogger can see, this is not a story about a report on the health of the NHS and the cost of treatments, but a cynical piece of privitisation propaganda PR. This is where the effect of Bad PR can be at its worst, influencing public perception and potential policy decisions.